What Can Christians Today Learn from the Miraculous Healing of the Soldier’s Ear?

As we observe Lent leading up to Easter, it benefits us to meditate on different aspects and details of the narratives around the death and resurrection of Jesus. An interesting moment is Christ’s miraculous healing of the soldier’s ear.

Every event in the Easter story possesses a depth of layers. Through looking at the context of the day the situation, and with the guidance of the Holy Spirit, we discover meaning and truths still relevant for us today.

Amidst the drama the night Jesus was arrested for execution, leading to the cross, the Son of God takes a moment to heal a soldier’s ear. Why did Jesus heal the soldier? What can we learn from this today?

Where in the Bible Do We Read About the Miraculous Healing of the Soldier’s Ear?

The miraculous healing of the soldier’s ear is recorded in all four Gospels of the New Testament, providing a comprehensive account. The incident took place during the arrest of Jesus in the Garden of Gethsemane. Christ had just wrestled with his impending death on the cross, sweating drops of blood and submitting his will to the Father’s redemptive plan.

The specific biblical references to the healing of the soldier’s ear are found in the following passages:

In Matthew 26:51-54, the account describes how, as Jesus was being arrested, one of His disciples, identified as Peter, drew his sword and struck the high priest’s servant, cutting off his ear. Jesus swiftly intervenes, saying, “Put your sword back in its place, for all who draw the sword will die by the sword. Do you think I cannot call on my Father, and he will at once put at my disposal more than twelve legions of angels?”
Mark’s Gospel provides a concise version of the incident (Mark 14:47), stating that a bystander witnessed Peter’s act of cutting off the servant’s ear. However, Mark doesn’t explicitly mention Jesus’ healing of the ear in his Gospel.
Luke 22:50-51 narrates the event in a similar fashion to Matthew, highlighting Peter’s impulsive action and Jesus’ subsequent response. Jesus admonishes Peter, then miraculously heals the injured servant’s ear, saying, “No more of this!” as He touches the ear and restores it.
In John 18:10-11, the apostle also records the incident, identifying Peter as the disciple who drew his sword and cut off the ear of Malchus, the servant of the high priest. John emphasizes Jesus’ instruction to Peter to put the sword away, followed by the healing of the servant’s ear.

The four Gospels strengthen the testimony of the life of Jesus. Each comes from his own perspective and purpose, and these different details help believers understand the complete view of events and the Good News of Christ. This harmony models how each believer isn’t only a singular example of Christ but a part of a greater testimony of the Body of Christ at the same time.

In this case, all four Gospel writers feel including this narrative was centrally important. John even provides the soldier’s name, Malchus. In an age when ink and paper cost a great deal of money, they carefully chose what details to include. Jesus and the soldier aren’t the only central figures in this story, however. Peter’s violence instigates the scene.

Why was Peter Carrying a Sword in the Garden?

Peter, one of Jesus’ closest disciples, was known for his impulsive and zealous nature. In Luke 22:33-34, Peter declares his willingness to go to prison and even die for Jesus. His bold and assertive personality is evident throughout the Gospels, and this zeal might have led him to carry a sword as a symbol of readiness to defend Jesus.

Peter may have misunderstood or misapplied Jesus’ earlier instructions. In Luke 22:36-38, just before the events in the Garden of Gethsemane, Jesus tells His disciples to sell their cloaks and buy swords. Scholars interpret this statement from Jesus differently. On its face, Jesus literally tells Peter and the disciples to arm themselves. Since Jesus later rebukes Peter for using a sword, tension exists. Perhaps Jesus meant for Peter and the apostles to have swords for another time, not to fight to protect him. Others interpret Jesus’ words metaphorically, emphasizing the spiritual battles they would face rather than endorsing armed resistance.

Conflict and confrontation abounded in the week leading up to Passover. Jesus prophesied his own death before coming to Jerusalem, another awkward moment with Peter. The disciples, including Peter, were fully aware of the increasing hostility towards Jesus. The authorities sought to arrest Him, and tensions were high. Peter’s carrying of a sword could be seen as a response to the anticipation of physical threats and the need for self-defense.

Further, carrying a weapon was not uncommon in that cultural context, especially for personal safety in a volatile environment. The disciples, including Peter, might have viewed having a sword as a practical measure of protection, considering the uncertain circumstances they faced.

In the intense moment of Jesus’ arrest, when the armed crowd arrives to apprehend Him, Peter impulsively uses the sword to defend his Master, which was understandable from a human standpoint and in the context of their understanding of the Son of David Messianic prophecies. This impulsive act reflects Peter’s determination to protect Jesus, even resorting to violence.

Despite Jesus’ repeated teachings about His impending arrest, suffering, and death, the disciples struggled to fully comprehend the nature of His mission. The common perspective of the Messiah by Jews of the day expected Jesus to claim an earthly throne in Jerusalem. The Suffering Servant prophecies were considered by most scholars to be a separate individual, not the same as the Messiah. Peter, in his eagerness to protect Jesus, may not have fully grasped the divine purpose of Christ’s sacrifice and the nonviolent nature of His mission.

Why Did Jesus Heal the Soldier’s Ear?

Jesus’ decision to heal the soldier’s ear exemplifies His boundless compassion, even in the face of imminent betrayal and arrest. Instead of condemning the soldiers who were part of the arresting party, Jesus extends a gesture of healing, demonstrating His love for all humanity, including those who would play a role in His crucifixion. Every person was once an enemy of God in their hearts, a rebel seeking their own way, but God, in his love and mercy, provided a way to have eternal healing, revealed here in healing Malchus’ ear.

By healing the soldier’s ear, Jesus rebukes the use of violence as a means of achieving His kingdom. He underscores the principle that His kingdom is not advanced through physical force but through spiritual transformation and the acceptance of His sacrificial mission. This aligns with Jesus’ consistent teachings on forgiveness, love for enemies, and non-retaliation. Throughout His ministry, Jesus emphasized turning the other cheek, loving one’s enemies, and praying for those who persecute. Healing the soldier’s ear is a practical demonstration of these teachings in a moment of crisis.

The healing of the soldier’s ear also aligns with the Old Testament prophetic expectations regarding the Messiah. Isaiah 53:3-5 describes the suffering servant who would bear the sins of many and bring healing. Jesus, as the fulfillment of this prophecy, exhibits healing even in the midst of His own suffering.

On a practical level, Jesus’ intervention prevents further escalation of violence. By healing the soldier’s ear, He diffuses the tension in the moment and prevents a potential cycle of retaliation. Peter could have been arrested for the act, but with the healing, there was now no evidence it ever occurred. This act of grace disrupts the natural course of conflict and reflects divine wisdom in the face of human aggression.

As all of Jesus’ healings did, this one reveals the Kingdom had come upon them and underscores Jesus’ divine authority over creation. His ability to instantly restore the severed ear reflects His sovereignty and power over physical elements. This miraculous healing reinforces His identity as the Son of God with authority over life and death. Jesus didn’t need Peter to defend him. He had the power to defend himself, shown through the healing.