\n<\/p>\n
A study<\/a> published in the digital journal Cureus acknowledged that the risks presented by the COVID-19 mRNA vaccines \u201coutweigh the rewards.\u201d<\/p>\n It suggested that \u201cfor every life saved, there were nearly 14 times more deaths caused by the modified mRNA injections.\u201d<\/p>\n According to the study\u2019s authors, the claim that the mRNA vaccines were \u201csafe and effective\u201d was \u201cdubious at best,\u201d explaining that it took an estimated 52,000 vaccinations to prevent one death.<\/p>\n \u201cFederal agency approval of the COVID-19 mRNA vaccines on a blanket-coverage population-wide basis had no support from an honest assessment of all relevant registrational data and commensurate consideration of risks versus benefits,\u201d the study added. \u201cGiven the extensive, well-documented SAEs [serious adverse events] and unacceptably high harm-to-reward ratio, we urge governments to endorse a global moratorium on the modified mRNA products until all relevant questions pertaining to causality, residual DNA, and aberrant protein production are answered.\u201d<\/p>\n The authors noted that due to the risks of mRNA inoculations, it is \u201cunethical and unconscionable to administer an experimental vaccine to a child who has a near-zero risk of dying from COVID-19 but a well-established 2.2% risk of permanent heart damage based on the best prospective data available.\u201d<\/p>\n Similar concerns regarding mRNA vaccines were raised<\/a> by German chemistry professors.<\/p>\n The professors sent a letter to the Paul Ehrlich Institute (PEI), writing that \u201cthe problems with modRNA-based vaccines are becoming increasingly apparent.\u201d<\/p>\n